tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4989966954446423670.post5526135791910699826..comments2024-03-02T00:44:55.128-08:00Comments on Pleiotropy: Clergy accepting evolutionBjørn Østmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08859177313382114917noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4989966954446423670.post-58542048070033528282009-11-22T09:18:15.589-08:002009-11-22T09:18:15.589-08:00Bob, welcome.
You know that I agree with you, but...Bob, welcome.<br /><br />You know that I agree with you, but I see no reason to even contemplate clergy signing such a statement. Fruitless beyond the sane.<br /><br />There are two battles, here. One against creationism, and a bigger one against religion. They aren't the same, and the question is whether we should settle for getting rid of creationism (without otherwise being accomodationists)?Bjørn Østmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08859177313382114917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4989966954446423670.post-73553884233078191902009-11-22T01:47:43.063-08:002009-11-22T01:47:43.063-08:00We ask that science remain science and that religi...<i>We ask that science remain science and that religion remain religion, two very different, but complementary, forms of truth.</i><br /><br />That's progress, but I would prefer they said something like this:<br /><br />We ask that science remain science and that religion be eradicated, because science is reality, and religion is bullshit.bobxxxxnoreply@blogger.com